Impact of artificial intelligence on effective judicial protection
Posted: 26 June, 2023 Filed under: Jackeline Maribel Payé Salazar | Tags: access to justice, AI technology, AI-based programmes, algorithms, Artificial intelligence, automated court decisions, challenges, civil jurisdiction, COMPAS software, human rights, judge-robot systems, judicial protection, justice administration systems, predictable justice, regulatory frameworks Leave a comment
Author: Jackeline Maribel Payé Salazar
Lawyer
Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) makes a significant contribution to achieving timely and predictable justice. However, it is necessary to analyze the challenges that its use represents for the right to effective judicial protection. This right includes not only the right of people to access the courts of justice and to obtain a judicial decision in a reasonable period of time but also the right to obtain a decision duly motivated. This supposes that judicial decisions have to express the reasons on which they are based. In this sense, the author asks: is it possible to sufficiently guarantee the right to effective judicial protection if we use expert systems based on AI? What are the benefits of AI in the justice administration system? What is the “dark side” of AI? What are its limits, from the perspective of the right to effective judicial protection?
Ensuring the safety, effectiveness, and ethics of digital mental health solutions: a regulatory imperative
Posted: 9 March, 2023 Filed under: Abasiodiong Ubong Udoakpan | Tags: data protection, development, digital health interventions, digital mental health solutions, equitable access, Evidence-based regulation, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), health disparities, mental health, privacy, regulatory frameworks, resource constraints, Risk-based regulation, User-centered regulation, WHO framework, World Health Organization (WHO) Leave a comment
Author: Abasiodiong Ubong Udoakpan
Data Protection Advisor, Researcher and a Human Rights Lawyer
Introduction
As the use of digital mental health solutions continues to grow, there is an urgent need for regulatory frameworks to ensure their safety, effectiveness, and ethical use. The regulatory landscape for digital mental health solutions is complex and evolving. At the global level, the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a framework for digital health that includes guidance on the development, evaluation, and regulation of digital health interventions. The WHO framework emphasizes the need for evidence-based interventions that are safe, effective, and ethical, and that are responsive to the needs of different populations. The framework also highlights the importance of data protection and privacy, as well as the need for equitable access to digital health solutions.[1]
AfricLaw 