Judicial mechanisms as a complement to reconciliation efforts in transitional justice settings: Exploring opportunities in the Burundian context
Posted: 19 March, 2024 Filed under: Lyse Nathalie Menyimana | Tags: Arusha Peace agreement, Burundi, human rights violations, judicial mechanisms, judicial processes, mass graves, national reconciliation, post-conflict, right to justice, Transitional Justice, Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Ubushingantahe, victim-centered approach, violations Leave a comment
Author: Lyse Nathalie Menyimana
Researcher and independent consultant
Transitional justice
Transitional justice is a set of mechanisms established in post-conflict settings to deal with massive violations, acknowledge victims’ claims and attempt to deter violations from happening in the future. While recognising the lack of a perfect formula, whether in the definition or sequencing of the mechanisms, transitional justice (TJ) leaves space for every society to find its own way to deal with massive human rights violations (African Union Transitional Justice Policy, 2019).
While TJ is essentially based on four complementary pillars –truth, justice, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition– inspired by Louis Joinet, this brief article addresses the importance of the right (access) to justice, with regards to long term reconciliation in countries engaged in transitional justice processes such as the Burundi context. The author believes that the right to justice is fundamental and complementary to the right to truth, to reparations and that it can be seen as a precondition for national reconciliation.
Why Angola should ratify the African Protocol on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Beyond the legal imperative
Posted: 11 August, 2021 Filed under: Eduardo Kapapelo | Tags: Africa, African Disability Rights Protocol, African Protocol on the rights of Persons with Disabilities, Angola, ‘shellshock’, civil war, constitutional law, disability, disability rights, human rights, human rights violations, intellectual disabilities, Kalashnikov, military casualties, post-conflict, post-conflict state, psychological, psychology, PTSD, rule of law, shellshock, social norms, Sudan, Syria, trauma, Vietnam, violence, violent conflict, war, World War II, Yemen Leave a comment
Author: Eduardo Kapapelo
Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria
One of the main objectives of international and regional law is to ensure the widest scope of human rights and welfare. It has been reasoned that when the physical and mental health of individuals is promoted and safeguarded societies have a better chance of establishing peaceful societies in the aftermath of violent conflict.
Some of the earliest literature has identified that a significant proportion of military casualties are psychological. Such literature which has focused heavily from the perspective of soldiers who have had to fight and ultimately kill on the battlefield to a large extent neglected to adopt a wider scope – to include the civilian population who often receives the brunt of such violence in war-time.
AfricLaw 