Behind Bars: Understanding the Ramifications of Charging Defendants under the Criminal Code Law of Akwa Ibom State 2000 as against the 2022 Revised Law
Posted: 2 April, 2024 Filed under: Abasiodiong Ubong Udoakpan | Tags: 2000, ACJL, Administration of Criminal Justice Law, Boniface Adonike v. The State, Constitution of Nigeria, Laws of Akwa Ibom State, miscarriage of justice, newly enacted legislation, Nigeria, repealed law, Revised Law, The Criminal Code Law, written existing law 2 Comments
Author: Abasiodiong Ubong Udoakpan
Human Rights Attorney, Gender-Based Violence Specialist, Public Servant
Introduction
This article stems from an incident I witnessed in court while I was present to oppose a bail application of a defendant accused of defiling a 17-year-old girl. During the proceedings, a question arose from the bench regarding the necessity of amending a charge to align with the provisions of newly enacted legislation. While a senior colleague attempted to offer guidance to the Court on this matter, respectfully, her response was not thorough. Consequently, recognising the importance of providing clarity and insight on such a crucial legal issue, I deemed it prudent to draft a legal opinion addressed to the Honorable Justice before whom I appeared.
I was also humbled to discover that the judge found value in the arguments I presented within the legal opinion. Below is an excerpt from that document.
A socio-legal analysis of Nigeria’s Protection from Internet Falsehoods, Manipulations and Other Related Matters Bill
Posted: 5 December, 2019 Filed under: Tomiwa Ilori | Tags: Africa, Bill, Constitution of Nigeria, dissemination of information, ECOWAS, Fake News, false statements, freedom of expression, Frivolous Petitions Bill of 2015, ICCPR, internal rules, Internet Falsehoods, legislation, Manipulation, Manipulation and Other Related Matters Bill, Nigeria, Nigerian Communications Commission, online freedom of expression, platform regulation, Protection from Internet Falsehoods, restriction of content, social media, social media platforms 5 Comments
Author: Tomiwa Ilori
HRDA Alumni Coordinator/Researcher: Democracy, Transparency and Digital Rights Unit, Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria
Introduction
The curbing of information disorder online has become one of the most contentious areas in platform regulation. Not only do states struggle with the best approach to fulfill their responsibility to safeguard human rights, non-state actors, especially social media platforms are stepping in with self-imposed rules that may reflect scale but struggle with context on regulating free speech. The most prevalent challenge facing social media regulation, especially outside the United States whose free speech regime is regarded as liberal, is the varying degrees of the protection of free speech in other jurisdictions. Social media platforms also face the challenge of protecting free speech on one hand and catering to national contexts on the other. These variations are often due to the different socio-political local context of each country.
AfricLaw 