Implementation of the access to information law in Nigeria
Posted: 24 June, 2024 Filed under: Jacob O Arowosegbe | Tags: Access to Information Act, activism, civil society organisations, compromising democratic stability, freedom of expression, Freedom of Information Act, military regimes, nationwide protests, NFOIA, Nigeria, Nigerian 1999 Constitution, restrict access, right of access to information, rule of law, sanctions, system of security Leave a commentAuthor: Jacob O Arowosegbe
Solicitor and advocate of the Supreme Court of Nigeria
Introduction
Implicit in the guarantee for freedom of expression under section 39(1) of the Nigerian 1999 Constitution[1] is the right to receive and disseminate information and since this right is meaningless without a corresponding right to freedom of access to information, the latter is by implication granted. The right is, however, superseded by the constitutional recognition of the right of the government to restrict access to certain information confidentially received or which it considers prejudicial to public security, order, health, and morality.[2] An example of a law enacted to restrict access to government-held information is the Official Secrets Act, 1962.[3] Under the Act, virtually any information only needs to be placed under a system of security classification currently in use to deny members of the public access to it.[4] Public officials are in fact routinely required to keep sealed lips concerning the conduct of government business.
Proactive disclosure of information post the 2013 Model Law on Access to Information: Assessing the compliance of the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission with the Guidelines on Access to Information and Elections in Africa and the Declaration on Principles of Freedom of Expression in the 2023 harmonised elections.
Posted: 21 June, 2024 Filed under: Idirashe Amanda Chikomba | Tags: Access to Information, African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights, Constitution of Zimbabwe, Cyber and Data Protection Act, Declaration on Principles on Freedom of Expression, Electoral Management Bodies, Guidelines on Access to Information in Africa, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Model Law on Access to Information, national security, Presidential Proclamation, public accountability, right to access information, transparency, ZEC, Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe Electoral Commission Leave a commentAuthor: Idirashe Amanda Chikomba
Human rights lawyer
Introduction
Regional and international instruments guarantee the right to access information. Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (African Charter) and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) provide for the right to access and receive information. Both treaties have been ratified by Zimbabwe. Section 62 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013 (the Constitution) also guarantees the right to access information. The provision enunciates access to information to every Zimbabwean citizen or permanent resident, including juristic persons and the media. The duty bearers are outlined as any institution or government agency for purposes of public accountability.
Testing the Waters of Transparency: The Impact of Namibia’s Access to Information Act on Constitutionalism
Posted: 18 June, 2024 Filed under: Dunia P. Zongwe | Tags: Access to Information Act, accountability, ‘Fishrot’ Files, constitutionalism, corruption scandal, Gondwana case, Haufiku case, human rights, international standards, Namibia, national security, RAI, right to access information, rule of law, secrecy, secret information Leave a commentAuthor: Dunia P. Zongwe
Associate Professor, Alliance School of Law, India; and Adjunct Associate Professor, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa
Abstract
This paper decodes the right to access information (RAI) in the newly enacted Access to Information Act in Namibia. Passed by Parliament in 2022, this Act came on the heels of the infamous ‘Fishrot’ Files, the country’s ugliest corruption scandal, uncovered through massive information leaks. This paper evaluates the efficacy of the Act in advancing the goals of constitutionalism by enabling individuals to access information robustly and transparently, thereby holding the ruling elite accountable to the public.
This paper unfolds in four steps. It begins by describing the loopholes that existed in the law before 2022, pondering what these lacunae imply for constitutionalism. Next, the paper dissects the RAI in theory, doctrine, and as presented in the Access to Information Act 8 of 2022. It then examines the Act’s provisions on RAI against the provisions laid out in the 2013 Model Law on Access to Information for Africa, highlighting key parallels. Lastly, drawing on those parallels, the paper assesses whether the RAI, as consecrated in the 2022 Act, advances the goals of constitutionalism. The paper argues that, by excluding from its scope Cabinet deliberations, the Act watered down the presumption of disclosure, and, in that sense, it failed to close the last loopholes that allowed the executive branch to evade accountability. This paper adds to the relevant literature by revealing that implementing the RAI and the disclosure presumption may constrain the executive more effectively than the other organs of the state.
From limitation to derogation of rights: Revisiting internet shutdowns during elections in Africa
Posted: 14 June, 2024 Filed under: Chrispin Bosire | Tags: Access to Information, Access to the internet, African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, data protection, digital rights, dissemination of opinions, elections, free speech, Freedom of Information and Expression, government-led internet shutdowns, human rights standards, illegitimate restrictions, internet disruptions, internet shutdowns, liberty of expression, national security concerns, press freedom, violation of rights, vital electoral information Leave a commentAuthor: Chrispin Bosire
Advocate of the High Court of Kenya
Introduction
Free access to information, free speech and liberty of expression contribute to democratic elections. Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the African Charter) guarantees the right to receive information and safeguards freedom of expression and dissemination of opinions. Access to information and press freedom are important elements of free expression. This right is now exercised both offline and online, as provided under Principle 5 of the 2019 press freedom. However, systemic internet disruptions and restrictions on access to communication platforms are on the rise in Africa. This has negatively affected the people’s right to expression during elections, and meaningful access to vital electoral information, necessary to make informed decisions.
South Africa at 30: Navigating the legacy of policy versus lived realities
Posted: 10 June, 2024 Filed under: Naledi Joyi | Tags: apartheid, coalition government, community development, democracy, democratic principles, economic empowerment, education, equality, freedom, historical injustices, human rights violations, justice, pit toilets, serious crimes, socio-economic challenges, South Africa, structural inequalities, sustainable peace, violence 1 CommentAuthor: Naledi Joyi
Gender Officer, Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation
After three decades of democracy, South Africa stands at a crossroads grappling with the interplay between policy aspirations and lived realities of the majority of the black population. The country boasts one of the most progressive constitutions globally because it is based on equality, freedom and justice. Yet the lived realities of its citizens leave one asking ‘what good is a constitution if it cannot be implemented?’. Although policies to address historical injustices and structural inequalities have been developed, implementation has been a challenge leaving many of the previously disadvantaged populations still disadvantaged, resulting in the country being dubbed the most unequal society in the world, with the rich getting richer and poor getting poorer. The country’s identity is closely linked with violence, entrenched in the legacy of apartheid, which used violence as a method of control.
Lost in Faith: The Growing Menace of Religious Fanaticism in Africa and the Need for Intervention
Posted: 7 June, 2024 Filed under: Murithi Antony | Tags: Africa, African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, Boko Haram, child sacrifice, ethical principles, fasting to the point of death, fundamental human rights, Good News International Church, human sacrifices, international human rights instruments, Mungiki movement, political instability, religion, religious fanaticism, religious freedom, right to religious freedom, terrorism, Yesu wa Tongaren Leave a commentAuthor: Murithi Antony
LL.B candidate, University of Embu
Religious freedom is a cherished right we uphold,
But when it’s misused, the consequences unfold.
Ideologies that propagate self-harm and hate,
Demand constant vigilance before it’s too late!
Introduction
Religion is a system of faith and worship centered around a belief in a supreme being and a set of moral or ethical principles. It encompasses a way of life that provides hope, guidance, and even companionship to many individuals. Religion serves as a source of strength, comfort, and meaning, especially for individuals who seek to understand their place in the world and the purpose of their existence. Religion influences people’s thoughts, actions, and their relationships with others. Such characteristics of religion has made several believers to engage in extreme and controversial actions, including among others; human sacrifices, fasting to the point of death, and terrorism, believing that they will receive eternal rewards from their deity. Such is what is depicted as religious fanaticism, which must be regulated for the sake of sanity and protection of fundamental human rights in society. Upon this background, this article aims to analyse the status of religious freedom in Africa, the impact of the emergence of religious fanaticism, and advocate for intervention.
The National Sex Offenders Registry: Offenders’ Right to Privacy v The Safety of Potential Victims
Posted: 3 June, 2024 Filed under: Livhuwani Malelelo | Tags: convicted sex offender, gender-based violence, National Register for Sex Offenders, NRSO, POPIA, potential victims, pursuit of justice, right to privacy, sex offender, sexual crimes, sexual crimes against children, victimisation Leave a commentAuthor: Livhuwani Malelelo
LLB candidate, University of Johannesburg
The National Register for Sex Offenders (NRSO) is a list of convicted sexual offenders and although South Africa has an alarming rate of gender-based violence, this list only contains the names of offenders of sexual crimes against children and mentally disabled persons, meaning that the main purpose of this registry is to protect children and mentally disabled persons from these types of offenders. This list is not open to the public but is only open to institutions such as preschools, schools, hospitals etc so they can check if an employee or potential employee is a convicted sex offender. This is so as to protect the offenders right to privacy. Unfortunately, the NRSO seemingly prioritises the right to privacy of the offenders instead of protecting potential victims of said offender.